![]() |
|||
|
|||
Reader Response - Great Home Pages Really Suck
DevWebPro reader and frequent contributor Jamie Kiley responds to Cameron Moll's article "Great Homepages Really 'Suck' "(http://archive.devwebpro.com/devwebpro-39-20030627GreatHomepagesReallySuck.html).
Just wanted to comment on the feature article. I like the general concept--that home pages must pull visitors into their site. However, I disagree somewhat with the logic in describing the needs of "searchers" vs. "browsers." I understand the two different types of visitors, but I'm not sure that lots of options on the home page is the answer for the browser.
By definition, browsers don't have a specific agenda. Therefore, if you want them to take action on your site, you have to guide them--get them started down a particular path. In other words, websites should be focused on directing users. This means home pages should NOT have too many options, because they offer clutter and distraction. Multiple options do not suck users into the site. Focused, directed pages do, because they point toward a goal.
I think it's true that websites should not have excessively simple home pages like rentstinks.com. Their home page does not entice readers or give any direction about what to do. However, sites also should also not be chock full of content, with links everywhere. This tends to confuse people--even browsers.
Anyway, I enjoyed reading reading and just thought I'd throw my opinion out there.
BLOG TALK 
Become a WebProNews blog partner.
Twitter Uncomfortable With 'Tweet' Being Used In Third Party AppsLooks like Twitter is not looking the other way as much these days. TechCrunch reports that there is some concern at the ...
Flickr Just Now Allowing Connectivity With Twitter
Hulu Receives Good News Concerning Their Online Ad Format
Global Gaming Factory Buys Up Pirate Bay


